Snapchat and Twitter

In class we did the Com Tech Timeline Challenge which included technological advances that greatly impacted communication but excluded some heavy hitters because it ended at 2007. Some of those heavy hitters being Snapchat and Twitter.  

First is Twitter, I think the reason that this app blew up is because of the ease of access to information. Celebrities and major companies have twitter accounts and the great thing about the website is that people can talk directly to these big celebrities and big companies. And it works the other way around, celebs and companies can get instant feedback from people on twitter. I remember being hesitant to join because of the fact that anyone could have access to my tweets or to me and the implications that come from that. Now it is probably the most used app on my phone. 

Next is Snapchat, I remember this app being in the news when it first came out and people were very skeptical of it. The idea of taking a picture and having it disappear made it hard for some people to hop on board, me included. They say that they aren't keeping the photos anywhere, but we just never know. And it was the fact that people would send explicit photos and videos and could possibly end up in the hands of people with bad intentions. I only downloaded the app because of peer pressure and it’s never really been a favorite of mine, but my friends like to use it and it has always been a good way to keep up with them. I don’t use it that much just because I am more of a private person and don’t really like to put my business out there like that. Today I still use Twitter, Snapchat, and Instagram but not really to share things, mainly for entertainment. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Media Consolidation

Image
Media consolidation can be de fi ned as  the concentration of media ownership into the hands of fewer and fewer individuals or corporations. It is a growing issue because in 1983 90% of American media was owned by 50 companies, now that same 90% is owned by a handful of companies. An example of media consolidation is Disney owning  all of  the large networks like ABC, ESPN, The Disney Channel, Pixar,  Lucasfilm , and Marvel. They own  all of  these major networks and control what can be shown on them.  Why should you care about media consolidation? Well because for one thing, people are already losing faith and trust in mainstream media and news. The fact that these major news companies aren't even their own entities means that the people controlling them get to decide what is shown and what isn’t. The people that run these networks only care about money and making a profit, so they are only going to show things that help them accomplish that. Media consolidation is also
Read more

Gatekeeping

Image
For this blog post I am supposed to talk about a topic that was discussed in another  groups  EOTO presentations. One topic that interested me was gatekeeping .    Gatekeeping can be defined as  the activity of controlling, and usually limiting, general access to something. And when speaking in terms of media and broadcasting it is the filtering and/or withholding information from certain groups of people. It is something that I knew of but never put time into researching it. I always thought it was an inherently bad thing but it’s not always bad. There are a lot of factors that play a role in determining what is broadcasted; things like your geographical location, the time of year, and other current events. For example, people in  North Carolina  aren't going to be told the weather in Hawaii because it isn't relevant to them.  This is why  the news is centered around Donald Trump and what he’s doing and not what the troops are doing overseas; it’s not considered releva
Read more

Esports player given prize money back after Hong Kong statements

Image
Last week, a very well-known and successful game company, Activision Blizzard, disqualified professional Hearthstone player  Ng “ Blitzchung ” Wai Chung because of comments he made supporting the pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. Ng was originally suspended for a year and Blizzard took his prize money because it was a violation of competition rules. Anything that offends the public or tarnishes Blizzard’s image would result in a ban and loss of prize money.   Of course, everyone in the gaming community was mad about the actions that Blizzard took because they thought it was censorship (This is becoming a trend now). Players aren't allowed to say what they want because of this corporate entity that is governing over them and people think it is unfair, myself included. I get the business side of things but at some  point,  people  have to  realize that the players’ opinions don’t represent the opinions of the company.     After the outrage and response from members i
Read more